Tuesday, May 25
Election fears mount, and for good reason
This is interesting. A citizen can't sue over
paperless voting machines because he has no tangible proof he might be injured by the system.
That is, the plaintiff has no receipt to show from the
receiptless machine to show how receiptless voting machines may have harmed him to date, or may someday harm him in the future. Like on election day and the following inauguration day, for example.
How much time should be wasted confirming suspicions
that this federal judge may have been appointed by one of the Bushes?
Elsewhere, it has gotten so bad that some people who actually work in the trade say election machine scamming has
gone too far. -- Tom Nadeau
Comments:
Post a Comment
